2025:HHC:44850 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1443 of 2025 Date of Decision:20.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Hukam Chand …....Petitioner Versus Nipun Jindal ..… Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr.H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 18.08.2025 issued under the signatures of Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Hamirpur, Sh. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate, representing the respondents states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, has been complied with. 2. Careful perusal of the aforesaid office order, which is taken on record, reveals that respondents after having considered the case of the petitioner in light of mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated, have rejected the same. Since, there was only direction to consider case of the petitioner, no action of the respondents can be said to be contumacious. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:44850 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition, as such, same is disposed of with liberty to file appropriate proceedings in the appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to the order passed in purported compliance of judgment alleged to have been violated. (Sandeep Sharma) Judge December 20, 2025 (meera) 3 2025:HHC:44850 1. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge November____,2025 (shankar)