Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39054 (KAR)

M/S. TETRA SPACE FABRICATORS v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/15514/2025 · 2025-11-04

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44504 WP No. 15514 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 15514 OF 2025 (GM-KIADB) BETWEEN: M/S. TETRA SPACE FABRICATORS PLOT NO. 108 A, KIADB 1ST PHASE, VASANTHNARASAPURA INDUSTRIAL AREA TUMAKURU 572128. REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, MS ABHISHEK DEY OFFICE AT NO. 671/673, VV RAMU ESTATE, BOMMASANDRA, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE 560009., …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARAN N. MAJAGE., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE- 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001. 3. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KIADB, TUMKUR DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B. RAVINDRANATH., AGA FOR R1; Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44504 WP No. 15514 of 2025 SRI. H.L. PRADEEP KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO 2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONERS DATED 24.02.2025, 01.02.2025, 19.02.2025. VIDE ANNEXURE-G, E & F AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO 2832 EXECUTE THE SALE DEED IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: i) Direct the respondent No. 2 and 3 to consider the representation of petitioners dated 24.02.2025, 01.02.2025, 19.02.2025 vide Annexure-G, E & F and direct the respondent No. 2832 execute the sale deed in favour of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner had been allotted plot number 108A of Vasanthanarasapura Industrial area, Tumkuru on 24.06.2011, possession was only granted on 24.12.2021 and the sale agreement was executed on 22.04.2013. The petitioner contending that the petitioner has complied with all the obligations, submitted representation on 18.04.2024 and - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44504 WP No. 15514 of 2025 28.10.2024 at Annexures-C and D, for execution of sale deed in favour of the petitioner by converting the leasehold property into freehold property. Subsequently, representations were submitted on 14.02.2025, 1.02.2025 and 18.02.2025 at Annexures-E, F and G, which were also not considered. In that background the petitioner is before this court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs. 3. The petitioner being allottee of the land from the KIADB, having contended that it has complied with all the obligations, it is but required for the respondent-KIADB to have considered the representations, pass necessary orders and execute a sale deed, if all compliances have been made. If not, to inform the petitioner of the compliances yet to be made, after which the aspect of execution of sale deed could be considered. Neither of them having been made, I pass the following: - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44504 WP No. 15514 of 2025 ORDER i. The petition is allowed. Mandamus is issued. ii. Respondent No.2 and 3 are directed to consider the representations at Annexures-C, D, E, F, G and H, within a period of four weeks from the date of receiving copy of this order. iii. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the matter. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE LN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65