[2025:RJ-JP:10470] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 904/2025 Sumit Agarwal S/o Late Shri Virendra Agarwal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Plot No. A-27, Swaroop Vihar, Ramnagariya Road, Jagatpura, Police Station Ramnagariya, Jaipur. Currently Residing As Tenant C/o Ramgopal Meena At House No. C-39, Surya Vihar Colony, Jagatpura Road, Getor, Police Station Jawahar Circle, Jaipur. (At Present Confined At District Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma, Adv., with Mr. Rishi Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.480/2024 registered at Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence punishable under Section 305(a) of BNS, 2023. Later on, Police filed charge-sheet in this matter. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. She contends that charge-sheet has already been filed and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. [2025:RJ-JP:10470] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-904/2025] She argues that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is a habitual offender as 26 other criminal cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as also looking to the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Sumit Agarwal S/o Late Shri Virendra Agarwal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve [2025:RJ-JP:10470] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-904/2025] in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in every week of the month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/137