$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16956/2025 PRINTS PUBLICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Sahi, Ms. Kritika Sahni and Mr. Chirag Ahluwalia, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Sanjiv K. Saxena, Mr. Mukesh K. Tiwari, Ms. Reba Jena Mishra & Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 19.01.2026 1. The petition is for the following relief: “(a) Issue a writ order or direction, directing the Respondent No. 2 to take stringent action against the manufacturers of the aforementioned sub-standard Galvalume Corrugated Steel Sheets (as mentioned paragraph 5(iv) and 5(xxi)) and conduct immediate inspection and seizure at the factories / offices / shops of the manufacturers of the said products in terms of its powers as provided under Section 28 of the BIS Act and ensure immediate compliance with mandatory standards laid down in the interest of public safety; (b) Issue a writ order or direction, directing the Respondent No. 3 to conduct search and seizure of the premises of the manufacturers of the aforementioned sub-standard Galvalume Corrugated Steel Sheets (as mentioned paragraph 5(iv) and 5(xxi)) and conduct inspection in terms of the provisions of Section 22 of the CP Act; (c) Issue a writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to take pro-active steps for the applicability of the statutory guidelines in the market in respect of Galvalume Corrugated Steel Sheets and other This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/01/2026 at 14:05:56 construction materials, formulated as guidelines, in a manner that this Hon'ble Court deems fit.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, fairly points out that action has been initiated by the respondents against the complaint products. 3. Under these circumstances, the Court does not find it appropriate to continue the instant petition in its present form and instead direct the respondents to take the complaint to its logical conclusion with due expedition. 4. Liberty is however granted to the petitioner to take further steps if its grievance is not fully mitigated. 5. Even against remaining products, as well, the respondents presumably would take action. 6. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JANUARY 19, 2026 tr/ap This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/01/2026 at 14:05:56