1 APHC010817572016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9894/2016 Between: D Murali Krishna, Spsr Nellore Dist., & Anr. and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of A P Energy Hyd 4 Otrs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VEDULA SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL) 2. GP FOR ENERGY (AP) 3. N SIVA REDDY(SC FOR APTRANSCO) 4. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP) The Court Made the Following Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ Order or Orders Direction or Directions declaring 2 the action of the 3rd respondent in retiring the petitioners on completion of 58 years of age as illegal and unconstitutional and issue consequential directions to the 3rd respondent to continue the petitioners in service till they complete their age of 60 years and to pass...” 2. Ms.Lakshmi Priyanvita Pokuri, learned counsel representing Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 20.06.2025. ASR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.9894 of 2016 20.06.2025 ASR