Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39044 (AP)

Smt. S. Masroor Jahan v. The State of A.P.

WP/38801/2018 · 2025-07-15

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010804542018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 38801/2018 Between: 1. SMT. S. MASROOR JAHAN, W/O. S. SADDAM, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O.PATHURU, KALICHERLA VILLAGE, PEDDAMANDYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, WOMEN AND CHILD WELFARE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAMANDYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, KALICHERLA, PEDDAMANDYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. SHAKEELA BANU, W/O. ARIFULLAH, OCC. ANGANWADI WORKER (HELPER), ANGANWADI CENTRE, PATHURU, KALICHERLA, PEDDAMANDYAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BHASKAR GANDHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE(AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.38801 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents No.2 to 4 in appointing the 5th respondent in the post of Helper in Pathuru Anganwadi Centre as illegal, arbitray and ignoring the procedure contemplated under Law and consequently direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to appoint the petitioner for the post of Helper in Pathuru Anganwadi Centre and pass…” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Women and Child Welfare Department is in attendance. 3. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 16.07.2025 Pmk 4 20 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:38801 OF 2018 Date: 16.07.2025 Pmk