Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39039 (AP)

Koiri Saraswathi, v. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation,

WP/25358/2014 · 2025-08-10

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010810862014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25358/2014 Between: 1. KOIRI SARASWATHI,, W/O.TATA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-12, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. KOIRI TATA RAO,, S/O.LATE APPANNA, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU, EX.SERVICEMAN, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-12, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. SMT.S.PARVATHI,, D/O.IATE APPALASWAMY, AGED 40 YEARS, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-12, MARRIPALEM P.O., VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SMT.B.GOWRISWARI,, W/O.POORNACHANDRA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-26, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM POST, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 018. 5. SMT.A.LATHA,, W/O.NARASINGA RAO, AGED 28 YEARS, R/O.DR.NO.38-19-50, MARRIPALEM P.O., 104 AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 18. 6. SMT.ARATY,, W/O.BIRENDRA PRASAD ROY, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-12/1, MARRIPALEM P.O., 104 AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 18. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY TIS COMMISSIONER. 2. ALLURI DURGA RAO, S/O.LATE GURUVULU, AGED 70 YEARS, HINDU, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-13, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. ALLURI SOMULAMMA RAMALAKSHMI, W/O.DURGA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS, HINDU, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-13, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. ALLURI LAKSHMI, W/O.APPALAREDDY, AGED 40 EYARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, R/O.DR.NO.38-20-13, 104 AREA, MARRIPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) 2. A S C BOSE 3. 4. .... The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25358 of 2014 ORDER: 1. It is submitted by the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 that the dispute between the petitioners and un-official respondents ended up in out of court settlement and an agreement dated 03.09.2022 was also executed. 2. Recording the above submissions, this writ petition is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:11.08.2025 Dvs THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N 29 WRIT PETITION NO: 25358 of 2014 Date: 11.08.2025 Dvs