1 2025:CGHC:41221 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 825 of 2025 1 - Smt. Rekha Singh W/o Shri Dharmendra Singh Aged About 52 Years Presently Posted As Superintendent Of Police (Ajak), Jabalpur, (M.P.), R/o Flat No. 103, Tomsa Tower, 6th Battalion Campus, Ranjhi, Jabalpur (M.P.) ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Under Secretary Department Of Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya-Raipur, (C.G.) 4 - The Director General Of Police Police Headquarter, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ankit Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ashutosh Shukla, Panel Lawyer. Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 14/08/2025 1. By way of this MCC, the applicant has prayed for following prayer:- “a) Modify the order dated 28.07.2025 passed in W.P.(S) No. 7802 of 2023 to the limited extent of granting liberty to the submit a detailed and comprehensive representation to Respondent No. 1 or any other competent authority; b) Direct the concerned authority to consider and dispose of such representation within 60 days, by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law; c) Pass such other order(s) as may be deemed just and proper in the interest of justice..” 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated 28.7.2025 passed in WPS No. 7802/2023, the petitioner is granted ample liberty and encouragement to approach this Court afresh by filing an appropriate petition if any exigency or grievance arises relating to her service conditions, transfer, or any other consequential matter. Such a petition would be considered independently on its own merits and in accordance 3 with law, ensuring that the petitioner is not prejudiced or denied her statutory or constitutional rights. He further submits that this Court may be direct the concerned authority to consider and dispose of the representation withing a period of 60 days by passing a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the grounds raised in the application, the concerned authority is granted 60 days more time to decide the representation. 4. Accordingly, the MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat