[2025:RJ-JP:45143] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11937/2025 Ankit Kumar Meena S/o Mahadev Prasad Meena, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Sakat Bani Ke Pass, Police Station Tahla District Alwar At Present R/o Bapu Enclav, Near Asharam Asram Goner Road, Police Station Kho-Nagoriyan Jaipur. (Present Confined In Centre Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Kartikey Joshi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 11/11/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.215/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jaipur, District-Jaipur City (North) for offences under Section 306 of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was employed at the residence of the complainant for providing nursing care to the complainant’s father. It is submitted that no recovery has been effected from the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:45143] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-11937/2025] Learned counsel contends that when a dispute arose between the parties regarding the remuneration, the present FIR was lodged on false and concocted grounds, that too after an inordinate delay of five months. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.09.2025. No custodial interrogation is required. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Ankit Kumar Meena S/o Mahadev Prasad Meena shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/50