Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010806812018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 38958/2018 Between:
1. K. NARMADA, W/O. K. LINGA REDDY, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. KAMADHENU OUTSOURCING PVT. LTD. ADARSH NAGAR, PARASANAYAPALLI RAILWAY STATION ROAD, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the Respondents 2 and 3 as illegal and arbitrary and violative of clause 4 of the general terms and conditions/eligibility of the Tender Notice No. 469/2018-19 in deducting income
tax on the service charges at 3 percent already provided in the tender schedule and declare that the income tax will be recovered on the provisions of service charges only on the agencies commission and direct the Respondents 2 and 3 to permit the petitioner to execute the work in terms of the work order in Lr.No.469/ /General Funds/2017-2018/Dman/E1/E2 dated nil. 08. 2018 in terms of clause 4 of the general terms and conditions/eligibility, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to permit the petitioner to-execute the works in terms of the work order in Lr.No.469//General Funds/2017- 2018/Dman/E1/E2 dated nil.08.2018in terms of clause 4 of the Tender Notice No.469/2018-19, pending disposal of the writ petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the additional material papers in WP.No. 38958/2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. R ANNAPURNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
R ANNAPURNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P. No.38958 of 2018 ORDER:
1. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner(s), represented that in the light of the subsequent developments, the cause in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Petition. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 10.07.2025
eha
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WP No.38958 of 2018 Date: 10.07.2025
eha
U