SMT. ANKITA SIROTHIYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA529/764/2025 · 2025-04-09
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 39031 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:53090 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 764 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Ankita Sirothiya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to decide the Application No. 93 of 2023 pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge, (J.D.)/ F.T.C. (Crimes against Women) Orai, Jalaun arising out of Misc. Case No. 90023 of 2021 under Sections 12 Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2. It is also submitted that final order was passed by the Court on 10.7.2023 whereby the opposite party no.2 was directed to pay some maintenance amount to the applicant but as a matter of fact nothing was paid to the applicant, who is the aggrieved in this case. Applicant is a lady and and she has no means for her livelihood. She is not in a position to attend the Court for the pairvi of the case on each and every date. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. Applicant is the wife of opposite party no.2 and she has a right for expeditious disposal of the case under the Domestic Violence Act, which is the object and mandate of the Act itself. 7. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid application within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder of the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and execution authorities, advocates, parties to the case, staff etc.
are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad