Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010037172025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/602/2025 SHEKHARAN PHUKAN @ SEKHORAN S/O. LT. SUKEN PHUKAN, R/O. OLD AMULAPATTY, P/O. P/S AND DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM. VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED AND 5 OTHERS REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, GOLAGHAT BRANCH, P/O. AND P/S. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM 2:ABDUL MATLIB S/O. MD. A MATLIB R/O. VILL.- GHUTLONG P/O. TEZPUR DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM. 3:NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIBRUGARH P/O. AND P/S. DIBRUGARH ASSAM. 4:KONRAM DAS S/O. LT. NALIA DAS R/O. KACHARI GAON P/O. AND P/S. TITABOR DIST. JORHAT ASSAM. 5:BIPLOP DAS S/O. SRI KONRAM DAS Page No.# 2/3 R/O. BEBIJEA KACHARI GAON P/O. PURONA TITABOR P/S. TITABOR P/O. AND P/S. TITABOR DIST. JORHAT ASSAM. 6:SAIDUL ISLAM S/O. MOFIZUDDIN R/O. VILL.- GHOTLONG P/O. KALIABHOMORA P/S. AND DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B HALDAR, Advocate for the Respondent : MR. A ACHARYA (R-3), Linked Case : RP(FAM.CT.)/0/0 SHEKHARAN PHUKAN ALIAS SEKHORAN GOLAGHAT ASSAM VERSUS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER GOLAGHAT ASSAM 2:MD ABDUL MATLIB SONITPUR ASSAM 3:NEW INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REP BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER DIBRUGARH ASSAM 4:KONRAM DAS JORHAT Page No.# 3/3 ASSAM 5:BIPLOB DAS JORHAT ASSAM 6:MD SAIDUL ISLAM SONITPUR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. BITU HALDAR Advocate for : appearing for NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 07.09.2026 Heard Mr. B Haldar, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. A Acharya, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent No.3. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 53 days of delay in preferring the connected Miscellaneous Appeal. 3. I have found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 4. This Court is of the opinion that going for issuance of notice upon the respondents for seeking their response would be sheer waste of time. 5. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. 7. A copy of the Memo of Appeal shall be provided to Mr. Acharya. 8. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant