APHC010805072015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. T. HARIPRASAD, ANANTAPUR DIST., S/O T. VANGANUR VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT (PRESENTLY WORKING AS SI OF POLICE B.KODUR) 1. SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE MYDUKUR HYD SUB-DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE, MYDUKUR REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD 2. A VENKATA RAMANA, S/O JAYANNA MEDICAL OFFICER, PHC, SIMHADRIPURAM, NATIVE OF MUNNELLI SC COLONY, B.KODUR MANDAL, YSR DISTRI9T. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 01.10.2015 made in P.R.C.No.33 of 2015 on the Badvel in so far as the petitioner(A4) is concerned by allowing this Criminal Revision Case and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2819/2015 T. HARIPRASAD, ANANTAPUR DIST., S/O T.OBAIAH, R/O VANGANUR VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT (PRESENTLY WORKING AS SI OF POLICE B.KODUR) ...PETITIONER AND SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE MYDUKUR HYD ANO, THROUGH DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE, MYDUKUR REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD A VENKATA RAMANA, S/O JAYANNA MEDICAL OFFICER, PHC, SIMHADRIPURAM, NATIVE OF MUNNELLI SC COLONY, B.KODUR MANDAL, YSR DISTRI9T. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 01.10.2015 made in P.R.C.No.33 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Badvel in so far as the petitioner(A4) is concerned by allowing this Criminal ass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO BAIAH, R/O VANGANUR VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER THROUGH DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICE, MYDUKUR REP. BY ITS PUBLIC A VENKATA RAMANA, S/O JAYANNA MEDICAL OFFICER, PHC, SIMHADRIPURAM, NATIVE OF MUNNELLI SC COLONY, B.KODUR ...RESPONDENT(S): CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 01.10.2015 file of the Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Badvel in so far as the petitioner(A4) is concerned by allowing this Criminal ass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 4297 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in P.R.C.No.35 of 2015 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of I class, Badvel, pending disposal of the criminal petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 01.10.2015 passed in P.R.C.No.33 of2015 on the file of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Badvel (for short, ‘the Trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, pursuant to the orders dated 01.10.2015, the Trial Court took cognizance against the petitioner (A.4) and accordingly arraigned him A.4. Challenging the same, the revision petitioner has filed the present Criminal Revision Case. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that according to his instructions, the grounds for filing the present criminal revision case no 3 longer survive for adjudication and, therefore, the criminal revision case has become infructuous. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that the cause no longer survive for adjudication, this court finds no justification to proceed further and, accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 26.09.2025 SAK 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2819 of 2015 Date: 26.09.2025 SAKs