APHC010812202014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1950/2014 Between: 1. YERIPALLI APPARAO, E.G.DIST., S/O LAKSHRNAYYA, D. NO. 16-4- 14/2, FISHERMAN, TARAKARAMA NAGAR, KAKINADA, KAKINADA PORT PS LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. YERIPALLI KRUPA E G DIST 5 OTHRS, W/O. APPARAO, HOUSEWIFE, R/O. PARLOPET, KAKINADA, KAKINADA PORT PS LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. YERIPALLI KASULU, D/O APPARAO, R/O PARLOPET, KAKINADA, KAKINCLA PORT PS LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. YERIPALLI CHINNA, S/O APPARAO, R/O PARLOPET, KAKINADA, KAKINADA POST P.S. LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. YERIPALLI DHARNA, S/O APPARAO, R/O PARLOPET, KAKINADA, KAKINADA PORT PS LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. YERIPALLI SATISH, S/O. APPARAO, HOUSE WIFE, R/O PARLOPET, KAKINADA, KAKINADA PORT PS LIMITS, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ( PETITIONERS 2 TO 5 BEING MINORS REP. BY THEM MOTHER AND GUARDIAN 1ST PETITIONER YERIPALLI KRUPA) 6. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS P.P. HIGH COURT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased tofiled under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., aggrieved by the order made in M.C.No.11 of 2014 dated 25.08.2014 on the file of the court of the Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3234 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of order dated.25-8-2014, made in M.C.No.11/2014, on the file of the court of the Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S A RAZAK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER :- The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous as the main case i.e., M.C. No.11 of 2014 on the file of the learned Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakinada was allowed in part on 06.01.2015. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 TM 84 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1950 of 2014 Date: 04.07.2025 TM