Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 39017 (RAJ)

RAM PRASHAD LODHA v. STATE HOME DEPARTMENTORS

CW/3800/2014 · 2025-11-12

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45532] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3800/2014 Ram Prashad Lodha S/o Shri Shri Ramchandra Lodha, aged about 26 years, R/o Village and post Salawad, Tehsil Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary Department of Home (Police Department) Government of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Head Office Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Inspector General of Police, Government of Rajasthan, Head Office Kota Range, Kota (Raj.). 4. The Superintendent of Police, District Jhalawar, (Raj.). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8255/2015 Yogendra Singh S/o Shri Giriraj Singh, Village Patpadiya Post Gagron Thesil Asnawar District Jhalawar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary Department Of Home Police Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Head Office, Jaipur Rajasthan 3. The Inspector General Of Police, Government Of Rajasthan, Head Office, Jaipur Rajasthan 4. The Superintendent Of Police, District Jhalawar Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Hada For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA [2025:RJ-JP:45532] (2 of 2) [CW-3800/2014] Order 12/11/2025 1. Both these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners in relation to the recruitment to the Post of Constable initiated in the year 2012. 2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the counsel for the respondents that after finalization of the aforesaid recruitment, subsequent 5-6 recruitment to the post of Constable have been finalized. 3. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the respondents have not constituted the committee for considering the objections raised by the petitioners as regards certain questions answers. 4. As per the order passed by the respondents on 07.12.2013 itself, they have constituted the committee for considering the objections regarding the question answers and found found no change in the result. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and more particularly the fact that after completion of the said recruitment 5-6 more recruitment for the post of Constable have been completed, this Court finds no merit in these petitions. 6. Accordingly these petitions are dismissed. 7. Stay application and all pending application/s, if any, also stand/s dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J GAURAV SRIVASTAVA /72-73