Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3900 (KAR)

LAXMIKANTH PARAMESHWAR HEGDE v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/100877/2024 · 2025-01-30

Hemant Chandangoudar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1821 CRL.P No. 100877 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100877 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. LAXMIKANTH PARAMESHWAR HEGDE A/A. 55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HITTALATOTA, PO. PUTTANAMANE, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581402. 2. NARAYAN PARAMESHWAR HEGDE A/A. 53 YEARD, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HITTALATOTA, PO. PUTTANAMANE, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581402. 3. SHRIDHAR JATTA PATAGAR A/A. 43 YEARD, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BENDEGADDE, PO. TARGOD, TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581402. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VAGEESH RAMANATH HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH RURAL POLICE STATION, SIRSI, REP BY. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD. 2. KIRAN DIVASPATHI HEGDE AGE. 44 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HITTALATOTA, PO. PUTTANAMANE , TQ. SIRSI, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA-581402. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK T.KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1; SRI. SOURABH HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2) B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.02.01 13:32:29 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:1821 CRL.P No. 100877 of 2024 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO, QUASH THE ENTIRE COMPLAINT AND FIR FILED AGAINST THE PRESENT PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 REGISTERED IN SIRSI RURAL POLICE STATION CRIME NO.0018/2024 SIRSI TALUK FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE U/S 379 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC COURT, SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking leave of this Court to dismiss the petition reserving liberty to the petitioners to file a petition afresh challenging the charge sheet. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for. Pending I.As, if any, do not survive for consideration. Sd/- (HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE BKM Ct:vh List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42