SMT. NIRMALA NAYAK @ PUSHPANJALI NAYAK v. CHANDRAPRAKASH NAYAK
FA(MAT)/268/2025 · 2026-02-04
Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Shri Sanjay K Agrawal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 390 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 390 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet FA(MAT) No. 268 of 2025 SMT. NIRMALA NAYAK @ PUSHPANJALI NAYAK versus CHANDRAPRAKASH NAYAK 05/02/2026 Vasant Mr. R.S. Patel, counsel for the appellant. Mr. Anil Gulati, counsel for the respondent. Two weeks’ time is granted to learned counsel for the appellant to rectify the default as pointed out by the Registry failing which this appeal shall automatically be dismissed without further reference to the Bench. List this appeal thereafter. Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Judge VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2026.02.05 16:51:24 +0530