Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38995 (AP)

Shaik Llour Abdul Sabhan v. Shaik Llour Sulthana

CRLRC/2908/2018 · 2025-07-03

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010803702018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2908/2018 Between: 1. SHAIK LLOUR ABDUL SABHAN, S/O. DASTHAGIRI SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC. WORKING AT URDU TEACHER, NANDYALA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHAIK LLOUR SULTHANA, W/O. SHAIK HOUR ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D. NO. 15/467, MUNTHAZ MANZIL APARUMENT, KAMALA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. HOUR AFREEN BANO, D/O. SHAIK /LOUR ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC. R/O. D. NO. 15/467, MUNTHAZ MANZIL APARTMENT, KAMALA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. LLOUR AFORZ JAHAN, D/O. SHAIK HOUR ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, OCC. R/O. D. NO. 15/467, MUNTHAZ MANZIL APARTMENT, KAMALA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. LLOUR SHAIK RIZWAN RAJA, S/O. SHAIK FLOUR ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. D. NO. 15/467, MUNTHAZ MANZIL APARUMENT, KAMALA NAGAR, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT REP. BY THE 1ST PETITIONER. 5. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this 2 Memorandum of Grounds in Criminal Revision Case against the Order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 297 of 2018 in FCOP .No. 116 of 2017 dated 10-8-2018 on the file of the in the court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Anantapurammin , for the following IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Order passed in Crl.M.P.No. 297 of 2018in FCOP .No. 116 of 2017 dated 10-8-2018 on the file of the in the court of the Judge, Family Court-cum-addition al District and Sessions Judge. Anantapurammin, pending disposal of the main Crl.R.C., and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A RAVI SHANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. The Court made the following: ORDER: As seen from the E-Courts status, the main case, i.e., F.C.O.P.No.116 of 2017 was disposed of vide judgment dated 08.07.2019. 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Hence, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 04.07.2025 SCS 3 195 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2908 of 2018 Date:04.07.2025 SCS