[2025:RJ-JP:37804] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14027/2025 Kishan Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Ramavtar Singh Shekhawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o 31, Hindustan Charity Trust, Kanak Ghati, Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, De- partment Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Govern- ment Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. 3. Shri Sandeep Kumar Tiwari S/o Shri Shyam Sundar Ti- wari, Aged About 53 Years, Roll No. 601974, R/o Siddhi Vinayak Agro, Sharudal Singh Ki Naal, Bini Ki Burj, Choti Chopar, Jaipur - 302001 At Present Posted At Accountant, 4Th Rac Battalion Chanpura, Ramghad Road, Jaipur, (Rep- resentative Capacity) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Udit Mathur on behalf of Mr. Ankur Mathur For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 16/09/2025 1. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; he is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition within a period of four (04) weeks from today; and if a direction is [2025:RJ-JP:37804] (2 of 2) [CW-14027/2025] issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 within a period of four (04) weeks from today. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/29