Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38994 (KAR)

SRI. B.N VENKATA REDDY v. SMT. BHAGYAMMA

WP/18184/2022 · 2025-08-22

K Manmadha Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32793 WP No. 18184 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 18184 OF 2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. B.N. VENKATA REDDY S/O SRI VENKATARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/A BYRASANDRA VILLAGE KOTAGAL POST CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT- 563 125 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NANDISH GOWDA G B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. BHAGYAMMA D/O SRI B M VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT CHIKKABANDARGHATTA VILLAGE BASETTIHALLI HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125 2. MISS AMBIKA D/O SRI B M VENKATA REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT CHIKKABANDARGHATTA VILLAGE BASETTIHALLI HOBLI SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125 SMT KONNAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32793 WP No. 18184 of 2022 3. SMT BYYAMMA D/O LATE KONAMMA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT IRAGAMPALLI MUNGANAHALLI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-563 125 4. SRI CHALAPATTI S/O SRI THONDEBHAVI SEETHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT UPPARLAHALLI KOTAGAL POST CHINTAMANI TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 563 125 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.M.SRINIVASA REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R3 V/O/D 18.11.2022, NOTICE TO R1, R2 AND R4 ARE D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTILCE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 30.06.2022 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINATAMANI IN FDP NO.21/2006 VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal of this writ petition as not pressed by reserving liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum subject to the limitation. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:32793 WP No. 18184 of 2022 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. This writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68