NAVEEN TEMANI S/O BRIJKISHORE TEMANI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/9766/2025 · 2025-10-08
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38991 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38991 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40917] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9766/2025 Naveen Temani S/o Brijkishore Temani, R/o 42, Shivshankar Nagar, Ajmer Bypass Road, Sanganer Road Ke Pass, Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur South, Rajasthan. ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through The Learned PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ajay Tyagi, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 08/10/2025
1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No.12/2024 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (ATS and SOG), District ATS and SOG for the offence(s) under Sections 66D of IT Act and Sections 308(6), 318(4), 319(2), 111(4) and 204 of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is residing in Dubai and is medically unfit, due to certain hip joint condition. It is submitted that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and apprehends arrest based solely on the statement of a co-accused. It is further submitted that the applicant is willing to cooperate in the investigation, provided the apprehension of arrest is stayed.
[2025:RJ-JP:40917] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9766/2025]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the matter involves a white-collar crime in which the applicant's entire family is involved. It is submitted that they presented themselves as police authorities and have made a retired lady to a digital arrest, extorting Rs. 80 lakhs from her. It is further submitted that the withdrawal of the extorted money took place in Dubai, where the applicant resides.
4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the complainant and the fact that entire family members are involved in the matter; this Court is not inclined to entertain the present bail application and the same is accordingly, dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /282