Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38985 (RAJ)

POKHAR MAL TANWAR SON OF SHRI REWARRAM v. MURLI SON OF RAMDEV

CW/14516/2025 · 2025-10-13

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41739] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14516/2025 Pokhar Mal Tanwar S/o Shri Rewarram, aged about 81 Years, R/o Plot No. A-125, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Murli S/o Ramdev, aged about 57 Years, R/o 1/485, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur & Plot No.1/953, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 13/10/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the learned Rent Tribunal No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan-I to decide the eviction petition No.141/2020 expeditiously. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen having age of 81 years and the case is pending before the Tribunal for its adjudication since 2020 and five years have passed, so appropriate directions be issued to the learned Tribunal to decide the said eviction petition on day to day basis i.e. within a period of two months. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi vs. State of Maharashtra1 while relying on the 1 2024 SCC Online SC 3526 [2025:RJ-JP:41739] (2 of 2) [CW-14516/2025] constitutional Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of U.P.2, has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline. 5. The aforesaid directions, as prayed for, cannot be issued by this Court. But looking at the fact that the petitioner is 81 years of age; the case is pending before the learned Tribunal for final arguments since 15.07.2024 and nine adjournments have been granted. Therefore, it is expected from the learned Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction petition expeditiously while ensuring that no unnecessary and unreasonable request for adjournment is entertained. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-87 2 2024 INSC 150