1 2025:CGHC:48454 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9313 of 2025 M.R. Sahu S/o Late Shri Mayaram Sahu Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Parsada, Tehsil Rajim, District Gariyaband (C.G.), At Present Posted At Assistant Director Sitanadi, Headquarter Nagari, Tehsil Nagari, District Dhamtari C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Forest And Climate Change Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Principal Chief Conservator, Forest And Head Of Forest Force, Aranya Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 3 - Principal Chief Conservator, Forest (Wildlife) Department, Aranya Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 4 - Chief Conservator Of Forest (Wildlife) And Field Director, Udanti Sitanadi Tiger Reserve Raipur, Raja Tala, Baloda Bazar Road, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 5 - Deputy Director, Udanti Sitanadi Tiger Reserve Gariyaband, District Gariyaband C.G. 6 - Bhopal Singh Rajput, Assistant Conservator Of Forest, Kanan Pendari, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur C.G., Permanent Address- Village Sirsida (Shivpur), Block Nagari, District Dhamtari C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. S.P. Kale, Additional Advocate General For Respondent No. 6 : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.09.23 11:03:16 +0530 2 22.09.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition to quash the transfer order dated 31.07.2025 passed by the State Government and to allow him to continue at the present place of posting i.e. as Assistant Director, Sitanadi (Nagari), District Dhamtari (C.G.). 2. After arguing for a long time, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already preferred a representation dated 01.08.2025 before the respondent authorities and prays that he may be allowed to pursue the same before the respondent authorities. 3. The submission made by learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner seems to be just and proper. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty granted in favour of the petitioner. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika