IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 1936 of 2025 Decided on: 04.12.2025 Mansa Devi …Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Jagan Nath, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Rajesh Kosh, Advocate for respondent No.5. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that pursuant to the order dated 21.11.2025 passed in this petition, the respondents have filed compliance affidavit. A copy thereof was made available for perusal. In terms of the compliance affidavit, the respondents have reconsidered the case of the petitioner and accordingly, issued office order dated 01.12.2025 allowing family pension in her favour subject to the outcome of Letters Patent Appeal statedly filed by the respondents against the judgment sought to be 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 enforced and also subject to the outcome of Review Petition stated to have been filed in State of H.P & others versus Roop Lal.2 2. Taking note of compliance affidavit and the office order passed by the respondent on 01.12.2025, this execution petition to stand disposed of. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that benefits flowing to the petitioner under the aforesaid order shall be released in her favour within six weeks. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of her surviving grievance if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 04 2025 (yogesh) 2SLP(C) 1007/2024.