G.Jalandhar Gowd v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its
WP/26290/2013 · 2025-06-29
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38968 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38968 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010798772013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26290/2013 Between:
1. G.JALANDHAR GOWD, S/O SRIRAMULU GOWD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 49-1-A-D-4,LAKSHMINAGAR, KURNOOL-518 002. ...PETITIONER AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, URDU GALLI, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, SANKSHEMA BHAVAN, BIRLA GATE, KURNOOL-518 002. 4. THE TAHSILDAR KALLUR MANDAL, KRISHNA NAGAR, KURNOOL- 518 002. 5. KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REP BY,
ITS COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the authorities
2
of the respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioner herein from the land admeasuring 0.11 cents in Sy.No.590, situated at Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process of Law, as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner, IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WVMP 3901 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP No. 32508 of 2013 in W.P. No. 26290 of 2011, dated 16-09-2013 IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 32508 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the authorities of the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring 0.11 cents in Sy.No.590, situated at Kallur village and Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 145644 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 3028 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.06-09-2013 in WPMP.No.32508 of 2013 in WP.No.26290 of 2013 or to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR&NEL MC)
3
2. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R
3. E V JAGANNADHA RAO (SC FOR AP STATE HOUSEING COOP LTD)
4. GP FOR REVENUE
5. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC)
6. B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR NEL MC)
7. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following order:
Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 26.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.06.2025 KA
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 26290/2013
Date: 30.06.2025 KA