I N THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 106 of 2016 Date of decision: 19.11.2025 Harmesh Chand & Anr. ...Appellants. Versus Prem Kumar ...Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellants : Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Arshita Sharma, Advocate. For respondent : Ms. Pragti, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Modgil, Advocate (through V.C.). Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Learned counsel for the appellants has placed on record a copy of compromise deed alleged to have been executed between the parties. He submits, on instructions, that the appellants intends to withdraw the present appeal, in view of the aforesaid compromise effected between the parties. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 19th November, 2025 Judge (Shamsh Tabrez) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?