Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38962 (PNJ)

NATHU RAM AND ORS. v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CWP/2587/2003 · 2025-07-24

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-1214-2003 with connected cases IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 209 1. CWP ROHTASH SINGH AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA 2. CWP ASHOK KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 3. CWP RAM PAL AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 4. CWP RAM KALA STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2003 with connected cases -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided On: CWP-1214-2003 ROHTASH SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-1299-2003 ASHOK KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-1995-2003 AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-1219-2003 AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Decided On: 24.07.2025 ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) Aman Dua 2025.07.28 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-1214-2003 with connected cases 5. CWP SATISH KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 6. CWP AMANJIT SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 7. CWP NATHU RAM STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 8. CWP NARENDER STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 9. CWP VINOD KUMAR AND OTHERS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS 2003 with connected cases -2- CWP-1531-2003 KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-1431-2003 AMANJIT SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-2587-2003 NATHU RAM AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-3644-2003 KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CWP-1593-2003 KUMAR AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) Aman Dua 2025.07.28 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-1214-2003 with connected cases 10. CWP MOHINDER SINGH STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR Present: Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA These petitions have been filed the Department, whereby Male Teachers, who were suffering from chronic disease Sonepat and Rohtak to other districts transfer was stayed 2. Learned counsel for the have been rendered infructuous, service as well 3. Disposed of as such. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file 24.07.2025 Ad Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? 2003 with connected cases -3- CWP-2461-2003 MOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA J.(Oral) These petitions have been filed impugning the order(s) passed by the Department, whereby Male Teachers, who were suffering from chronic disease, were transferred Sonepat and Rohtak to other districts. Operation of the impugned order(s) transfer was stayed way back in 2003. Learned counsel for the parties are have been rendered infructuous, and most of the petitioners have retired from as well. Disposed of as such. A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected file (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether reportable? ....PETITIONER(s) ....RESPONDENT(s) . JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Additional Advocate General, Haryana. impugning the order(s) passed by the Department, whereby Male Teachers, who were neither disabled nor transferred on deputation from Jhajjar, Operation of the impugned order(s) of parties are ad idem that the petitions most of the petitioners have retired from A photocopy of this order be placed on the connected files. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No impugning the order(s) passed by neither disabled nor Jhajjar, of that the petitions most of the petitioners have retired from Aman Dua 2025.07.28 10:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document