IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 1743 OF 2014 Between: Gorthi Satyanarayana Vara Prasada Rao, S/o.late Krishna Murthy, aged about 65 years, R/o.Dr.No.30-6-4, Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by his Power of Attorney Nadler, Sri Anne Narayana Rao, S/o.late Satyanarayana, Aged 54 years, R/o.Dr.No.2-181, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Near Old Diary Form, Visakhapatnam - 40. ...PETITIONER AND The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, rep. By its Commissioner, Visakhapatnam. The Chief City Planner, Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam. Alla Syamala Venku Naidu, S/o.Veerunaidu, Aged 39 years, R/o.Dr.No.2-16-2, Vijayaramarajupet, Anakapally-01, Visakhapatnam District. Cheepurpalli Pydi Naidu, S/o.ate Appalanaidu, Aged 76 years, R/o.Dr.No. 13-28, Nowdu Veedhi, Chodavaram, Visakhapatnam District.' Smt.Alla Mahalakshmamma, W/o.Veerunaidu, Aged 73 years, R/o.Dr.No.2-16-2, Vijayaramarajupet, Anakapally-OI, Visakhapatnam District Kanisetti Padma Kumari, W/o.Musilinaidu, Aged 38 years, R/o.Dr.No.38-31-22, Green Gardens, Marripalem, Visakhapatnam -18. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 4 7. Smt.Rompella Lakshmi Lalitha Kumari,, W/o.Verikateswara Rao, aged 45 years, R/o.Plot No.LIG-185, Phase-lll, VUDA Colony, Samathanagar, Pedagantyada, Visakhapatnam - 44. 8. M/s.Rani Builders, rep. By its Managing Partner, Sri Karri kameswara Rao, aged 45 years, Dr.No.31-28-17, Near Sivalayam, Kurmannapalem, Visakhapatnam - 46. (WP stands dismissed for default as against R5 for non compliance of Court order dated 11.04.2017) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate Writ, order direction to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 25.10.2013 and take appropriate action thereon and till such time, the Corporation may be directed not to allow any further constructions pursuant to the Building Permission in Permit No. 14929/2012/ACPA//G1, dated 13.12.2012 in the interest of justice. or I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 2088 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 not to allow any constructions pursuant to Building Permission in Permit No. 14929/2012/ACPA//G 1, dated 13-12-2012, pending disposal of the W.P. before this Hon’ble Court. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 6018 OF 20151 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 1 & 2 not to issue any occupancy certificates for the Building 14929/12/ACPA//G1, dated: 13-12-2012. constructed under permit No. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2:SRI A. S. C. BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3,4,6 & 7: SRI CH. VENKATA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No.8:M/s. J. K. ANITHA The Court made the following: ORDER COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH at AWIARAVATI Original Jurisdiction) APHC010793612014 IN THE HIGH [33331 (Special TMl IRSDAY the second day of JANUARY thousand and twenty five PRESENT SNIT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA TWO the honourable y,piT pftitION no- 1743/2014 Between; Gorthi Satyanarayana ...PETITIONER Prasada Rao, Visakhapatnam AND G.V.M.C.. Visakhapatnam Vara Dist and 7 ...RESPONDENT(S) The Commissioner Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1. G RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondent(S); 1.J K ANITHA lakshminarayana 3.CH VENKATA NARAYANA 4.ASCB0SE(SC FOR' The Court made the following; REDDY(SC for GVMC) 2.S municipal CORPORATIONS AP) \\ 2 HTV ORDER: Constitution of India is filed under Article 226 of the This writ petition is seeking the following relief:- nature of a Writ of to consider the direction more particularly, one in the Writ, order or direction "....to issue a Writ, Order or Mandamus, or any representation of the and till such time, the constructions pursuant /V/G1, dated 13.12.2012.... other appropriate and take appropriate action thereon further Petitioner dated 25.10.2013 Corporation may be to the Building Permission directed not to allow any ion in Permit No. 14929/2012IACP ino. learned counsel for the matter came up for hearing contentions urged in the Today when the reiterated the 2. Writ Petition, but, however to dispose of the petitioner respondent authorities limited his request to direct the submitted by the petitioner on 25.10.2013, requesting to stop representation unauthorized constructions made in the petitioner’s site by the unofficial the respondent Nos.3 to 8 herein. , learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent the respondent authorities will consider the dated 25.10.2013 and will pass On the other hand and 2 submits that 3. Nos.1 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law, if not yet disposed of. representation appropriate orders in of the case and into the merits of of the Writ Petition by facts and circumstances 4. Having regard to the submissions made by the this Court learned counsels, instead of going feels it appropriate to dispose No.t/The commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam made the case directing respondent Municipal Corporation Visakhapatnam, to consider the representation 3 by the petitioner dated 25.10.2013 passed, in accordance with law, date of receipt of a copy of this order. With the above direction no order as to costs. and pass appropriate orders, if not yet within a period of four (04) weeks from the 5. this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shaii be As a sequei, interiocutory Applications Petition, shall stand closed. pending, if any, in this Writ AOO.O-?^' naidu ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To. SEi N OFFICER 1. The Commissioner, Greater Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam. 2. The Chief City Planner, Visakhapatnam. 3. One CC to Sri G. Rama Gopal, Advocate 4. One CC to M/s. J. K. Anitha, Advocate 5. One CC to Sri Ch. Venkata Narayana, 6. One CC to Sri A. S. C. Bose (SC for 7. Three CD Copies. Municipal Corporation Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation [OPUC] [OPUC] Advocate [OPUC] Municipal Corporations) [OPUC] ssb HIGH COURT DATED;02/01/2025 0 5 FEB 2m . Current sieciion ^ ORDER o Co. WP.No.1743 of 2014 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS