APHC010796122018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 38465/2018 Between: 1. SAYYED RAMJANI, W/O S.J.C.SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NOW WORKING AS SCHOOL ASSISTANT (TELUGU), MRS.A.V.N.C.AIDED HIGH SCHOOL, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, GOVT. OF A.P. IBRAHIMPATNAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 4. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 5. THE CORRESPONDENT, MRS.A.V.N.C.HIGH SCHOOL VISAKHAPATANAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.-1. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M RAMGOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V RAVICHANDRAN 2. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.38465 OF 2018 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare petitioners promotion as School Assistant (Telugu) vide Proc.Rc.No.2853/81/2017 dt.27.09.2017 by the 1st respondent against the vacancy existing since 2011-2012 as per the rules then in vogue as per pre-amended Rules issued in .G.O.Ms.No.14 dt.05.02.2017 to G.O.Ms.No.11 dt.23.01. 2009 is perfectly legal and valid with all consequential benefits by holding the action of the respondents in not appreciating the facts and circumstances as per G.O.Ms.No.14 dt.05.02.2017 which is prospective effect the vacancies which arose subsequent to the said date which is illegal, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and pass…” 2. None appeared for the petitioner, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner today, as well as on the previous adjournment. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Education Department is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 16.07.2025 Pmk 4 19 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:38465 OF 2018 Date: 16.07.2025 Pmk