Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38958 (HP)

DAGU RAM v. LAKSHMI KANT AND ANR

CRMP/5641/2025 · 2025-12-20

Rakesh Kainthla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dagu Ram Vs. Lakshmi Kant and another Cr. Revision No. 364 of 2022 20.12.2025 Present: Mr. Vishal Bindra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.A. Safee, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Jitender Sharma, Additional Advocate General for respondent No.2/State. Cr.MP No. 5641 of 2025 Learned counsel for the non-applicant/ petitioner has submitted that he has no objection in case the amount is ordered to be released. In view of this statement as well as the fact that the matter was compromised between the parties, the present application is allowed and the amount is ordered to be transmitted to the bank account of the applicant/ complainant, details whereof have been furnished in para- 3 of the application, after due identification. Application stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 20th December, 2025 (Chander)