HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10561/2025 1. Ranveer Singh Son Of Sahi Ram, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 1, Village Sanwlod, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu Raj. 2. Shersingh Son Of Mangla Ram Yadav, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Badbar, Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Food And Civil Supplies Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Deputy Commissioner And Deputy Administrative Secretary, Food And Civil Supplies Department, Jaipur. 3. District Collector (Ration), District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Bharadwaj, Adv. Mr. Rajat Singh Mr. Balvendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Vaishnav for Mr. Lokendra Singh Rao, Dy. GC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/08/2025 1. The present petition pertains to allotment and other issues pertaining to fair price shops and the competent authority is stated to be concerned District Collector or any officer authorised by him. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has taken a preliminary objection that the matters primarily pertain to policy and there are different factual disputes which can be addressed before the (2 of 2) [CW-10561/2025] competent authority. However, he is agreeable to the fact that the contentions or grievances of the petitioners herein can be heard within a period of 15 days by the competent authority i.e. District Collector. It is submitted that after giving due audience and considering the representation of the petitioners, appropriate speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 3. In light of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court deems it proper to dispose of these petitions with a direction that the petitioners or aggrieved parties mark their appearance before the concerned District Collector on 10.09.2025 at and around 11:00 am and after giving due audience, speaking order will be passed by the competent authority. 4. This Court makes it clear that till passing of orders, the allotment of the shops qua the disputed sites will be kept in abeyance; passing of this order will not cause any prejudice to either of the sides. 5. The present petition is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. 6. Appropriate remedy will be available to the petitioners, if they are aggrieved by the order passed by the District Collector. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /35