[2025:RJ-JP:41495] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19202/2022 1. Lad Bai Meena W/o-Bhola Shankar, Aged About 37 Years, R/o-Village-Urasi,bundi,dist-Bundi,raj. 2. Satish Kumar Jain S/o-Jiwandhar Kumar Jain, Aged About 36 Years, R/o-Ward No-3,bagrion Ki Gali, Nainwa, Raj. 3. Savita Vashistah D/o-Kailash Chand Vashistah, Aged About 39 Years, R/o-Balchand,pada,bundi,dist-Bundi, Raj, 4. Keshav Sen S/o-Suresh Chandra Sen, Aged About 38 Years, R/o-22, Bhula Pada, Ward No-12, Kehoraipatan, Bundi,dist-Bundi, Raj. 5. Nirmala Chaudhary D/o-Harendra Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o-Ramjanki Mandir, Aktass,bundi,dist-Bundi, Raj. 6. Neha Sharma W/o-Anuraj Sharma, Aged About 36 Years, R/o-House No-2,jai Vidhata Colony, Balaji Town, Khedli Phatak, Kota,raj. 7. Kamal Kumar Jain S/o-Chand Mal Jain, Aged About 43 Years, R/o-Vakil Colony, Mandalgarh, Bhilwara, Dist- Bhilwara,raj. 8. Amit Kumar Vijay S/o Shri Shiv Shankar Vijay, Aged About 39 Years, R/o-Shanti House No-C-32,madhuban Colony,bundi,dist-Bundi,raj. 9. Naveen Kumar S/o-Surya Kiran Maheshwari, Aged About 37 Years, R/o-196, Old Gram Panchayt Ki Gali, Sathoor, Bundi, Raj. 10. Abdul Hakeem S/o-Abid Hussain, Aged About 34 Years, R/o-121,brahmpuri Badi Maszid Ke Pass, Bundi,dist- Bundi, Raj. 11. Laxmi Kedwal D/o-Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o-Danmal Ji Ka Nohara,bundi, Dist-Bundi, Raj. 12. Nitin S Nayar S/o-S K Nayar, Aged About 35 Years, R/o- House No-92,vrindavan Vihar,balita Road, Kunhadi, Girdharpura, Dist-Kota,raj. 13. Yatendra Barodia S/o-Khemchand Barodia, Aged About 37 Years, R/o-126,chawani Police Choki Ke Pass, Rooppura, Kota ,raj. ----Petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:41495] (2 of 4) [CW-19202/2022] Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director Cum Commissioner ,rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad,sikar. 4. Development Officer,panchayat Samiti,nainwa, Bundi 5. Development Officer,panchayat Samiti,k Pattan, Bundi 6. Development Officer,panchayat Samiti,hindauli, Bundi 7. Development Officer,panchayat Samiti,taleda, Bundi 8. Development Officer,panchayat Samiti, Bundi ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naveen Dhuwan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena, AAAG for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that Your Lordship may be pleased to allow this appeal and kindly be quash and set aside the seniority list (Annex.7) dated 16/11/2022 and further be pleased - (i). by an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondents to re-drawn the seniority list as per Rules and Circular of the state in order to merit of the candidate in common selection list. [2025:RJ-JP:41495] (3 of 4) [CW-19202/2022] and (ii). by an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature thereof and thereby direct the respondents to include the name of Petitioners in the seniority list at the place where they stand as per their place in common selection list, or from the date from which the benefit of ACP and notional benefits granted to the Petitioners,and after that the petitioner kindly be considered for the promotion on the post of UDC (iii). Any other appropriate writ, order or directions deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioner and in the interest of justice..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve their grievances. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents while referring order dated 01.09.2015 passed by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Babu Lal Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B. CWP No. 144/2015 and connected matters submitted that they are acting in compliance of order passed by Hon’ble this Court and will decide representation, in light of legal position. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation submitted by the [2025:RJ-JP:41495] (4 of 4) [CW-19202/2022] petitioners but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /119