Executive Director v. Controlling Authority under the Payment Gratuity Act 1972
WP/10096/2016 · 2025-03-28
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38952 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38952 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010793502016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10096/2016 Between: Executive Director ...PETITIONER AND Controlling Authority Under The Payment Gratuity Act 1972 and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S RAVINDRANATH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. HARINATH N (DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)
2. The Court made the following:
When the matter is called, the learned counsel for the petitioner is not available on the earlier occasions i.e., 07.01.2025, 28.01.2025, 21.03.2025 and even today also.
2
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 28.03.2025 LSP
3
199
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 10096/2016
Date: 28.03.2025 LSP