1 2025:CGHC:32752 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 789 of 2023 1 - Muler Bai Wd/o Late Kenda Ram Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Jamdeyi, P.S. Jainagar Tehsil And District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Paras Ram S/o Late Kenda Ram Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Jamdeyi, P.S. Jainagar Tehsil And District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Brihaspati D/o Late Amal Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Jhirmiti P.S. And Tehsil Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Biraso Bai D/o Late Amal, W/o Sant Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Lalaati P.S. Tehsil Udaipur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioners versus 1 - Kashi Ram S/o Sukhdev Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Kharsura, P.S. And Tehsil Udaipur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Meena D/o Late Sukhdev Mother Late Dashmet Bai Aged About 42 Years Caste Gond R/o Village Shivprasadnagar P.S. And Tehsil Bhaiyathan District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Nadhiyaro D/o Late Sukhdev, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kharsura, P.S. And Tehsil Udaipur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Ramuniya D/o Late Sukhdev Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kharsura, P.S. And Tehsil Udaipur District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Panik Sai S/o Kenda Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Lalaati, P.S. And Tehsil Lundra District Surguja (Chhattisgarh) 6 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Surguja, Ambikapur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- For Petitioners : None. For Respondent/ State : Shri Shubham Bajpayee, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14.07.2025 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioners even when the case is taken up for hearing in the second round. 2. It appears that an application moved by the petitioners under Order 14 Rule 5 of CPC was rejected by the learned trial Court. Learned trial Court has assigned sufficient reasons for rejecting the said application. It is also held by the learned trial Court that the issue proposed by the plaintiffs is already covered under Issue Nos.1 & 2, which pertain to whether plaintiffs No.1 & 2 have a right over 1/3rd share of the suit property. 3. Taking into consideration the reasons assigned by the learned trial Court, I do not find any good ground to interfere with the order passed by the Court below. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi