2025:JHHC:12660 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 269 of 2009 ---- Rajdev Ram son of late Narayan Ram, resident of village Parihara, P.O. Tildag, P.S. Garhwa, District Garhwa (Jharkhand) …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director General and Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Dhurwa, P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, North Chotanagpur Range, Hazaribagh, P.O. and P.S. Hazaribagh, District Hazaribagh 4. The Superintendent of Police-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, Koderma, P.O., P.S. and District Koderma .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate For the Respondents :M/s. Kumar Pawan, Vaibhav Joshi, A.C to S.C (Mines)-III -- 05/28.04.2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: (i) For quashing of letter dated 2.7.2008, by which the claim of the petitioner for appointment to the post of constable has been rejected stating therein that the name of the petitioner figured in the list of 932 candidates which was found to be defective and hence, the petitioner is not entitled for appointment, although the petitioner has applied and was successful in the merit list prepared for this purpose and to consider his case for appointment on the post of Constable. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, since the entire process for appointment has now been completed as stated by learned counsel for the respondent, which has not been controverted by leaned counsel for the petitioner; accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as infructuous. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk