APHC010795912018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 38410/2018 Between: 1. SYED MASTAN, S/O MASTAN, EX- DRIVER, APSRTC, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O VELAGAPUDIVARI STREET, 11TH WARD, ISUKAPALLI, REPALLE, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER, APSRTC, REPALLE DEPOT, GUNTUR. 2. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any appropriate order(s) or direction or a writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents not implementing the high court order and their own circular dated 08.09.1992 PD No. 89/82 and also the other circular dated 28.12.2016 No. L1/876(36)/ 2016 - RM(G) is illegal / arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and the circulars issued by the respondents for the benefit of employees and against the principles of Article 21 of the constitution of India consequently directing the respondents to settle petitioner due amount at the earliest and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents to implement office order No. L1/876(36)/2016-RM(G) by releasing the pending back wages amount as directed by this Honorable 2 Court in writ petition WP. No. 956 of 2009 dated 19.09.2016 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOPAL DAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SANISETTY VENKATESWARLU SC For APSRTC The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 38410 of 2018 O R D E R: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “.....to to issue any appropriate order(s) or direction or a writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents not implementing the High Court order and their own circular dated 08.09.1992 PD No. 89/82 and also the other circular dated 28.12.2016 No. L1/876(36)/ 2016-RM(G) is illegal / arbitrary against the principles of natural justice and which is against the principles of Article 21 of the constitution of India. Consequently direct the respondents to settle petitioner due amount at the earliest and pass such other order or orders….” 2. There is no representation for the petitioner, though the matter is posted today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even on earlier occasions, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri Venkateswarlu Sanisetty, learned Standing Counsel for APSRTC, representing the respondents, is present. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 5. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI 22nd July, 2025 cbn 5 26 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.38410 of 2018 22nd July, 2025 cbn