Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38939 (ALL)

SMT. ANITA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

SPLA/2071/2012 · 2025-09-11

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 2071 of 2012 Court No. - 29 (SL No.22) HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the special appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the special appeal is dismissed as infructuous. 4. In case the appellant feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to her to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 12, 2025 Shubham Arya Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Siddhartha Varma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Smt. Anita Yadav .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad