1 2025:CGHC:46148 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9395 of 2025 1 - Narendra Kumar S/o Sitaram Aged About 37 Years Occupation- Assistant Teacher (LB), Government Primary School Sulara, Block Division Kartala, District Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Public Instruction Directorate Chhattisgarh First Floor, C-Block Indiravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Education Department Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Korba District Korba (C.G.) 5 - Secretary District Rationalization Committee (District Education Officer) Korba District Korba (C.G.) 6 - Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kartala District Korba (C.G.) 7 - Block Education Officer Kartala District Korba (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. For State/Respondents : Mr. S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas, J. Order on Board 10-09-2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking the following relief(s):- Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2025.09.12 12:09:46 +0530 2 “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and quash the impugned order dated 31.5.2025 and 07.07.2025 (ANNEXURE P/1 and P/2) which relates to order of transfer of the petitioner from the present place of posting i.e. from Government Primary School Suiara Block Division Kartala District Korba to Primary School Kothikarra Block Podi Uproda, Distt. Korba (C.G.) 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to decide the representation on dated 18.07.2025 to post the petitioner at the nearest Vacant Single Teacher Primary School in accordance with law. 10.3 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is apprehending that the teachers appointed on the basis of Maandey will be posted at nearby schools according to their choice by the respondents, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to repeat the same if such occasion arises. 3. Learned State counsel has opposed the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Aadil