APHC010787602014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1870 OF 2014 Between: 1. CHITTETI RAVI KIRAN, S/O. SUBRAHAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.691, 3RD CROSS, 7TH MAIN MUNIANTAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-16, KARNATAKA STATE. 2. CHITTETI PRABHAVATJO, W/O. SUBRAHAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.691, 3RD CROSS, 7TH MAIN MUNIANTAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BANGALORE-16, KARNATAKA STATE. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT HYDERABAD. 2. CHITTETI GEETHA, W/O. RAVI KIRAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O.28-25-9/1, NASRULLA KHAN STREET, ARUNDALPET, VIJAYAWADA-2. ...RESPONDENTS Revision filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for record and set aside the judgment in Crl.A.No.94 of 2013, dated 29.4.2014, on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila court, Vijayawada, wherein and whereunder the order in DVC.No.17 of 2012, dated 29.04.2013, on the file of the I Addl. Chief 2 Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District is set-aside and pass such other orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 2931 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of (38) days in representing the Crl.R.C. SR No. 27527 of 2014, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3113 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the judgment in Crl.A.No. 94 of 2013 dated 29-04-2014 on the file of the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada, Krishna district pending disposal of the criminal case. IA NO: 3 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3744 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay granted in Crl.RC.MP.No.3113 of 2014 in Crl.RC.No.1870 of 2014 dt.12.09.2014 pending disposal of the Clr.R.C. No.1870 of 2014 and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V.R. AVULA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A TULSI RAJ GOKUL 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the Judgment dated 29.04.2014 passed in Crl.A.No.94 of 2013 on the file of learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada (for short, ‘the 1st appellate Court’), wherein the order passed in D.V.C.No.17 of 2012, dated 3 29.04.2013, on the file of I Additional Chief Metrpolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District (for short, ‘the trial Court’), is set aside. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 and Sri K. Sandeep, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, appearing for the 1st Respondent/State. 3. The present Criminal Revision is filed questioning the judgment dated 29.04.2014 in Crl.A.No.94 of 2013, wherein the appeal is allowed by setting aside the orders dated 29.04.2013 in DVC No.17 of 2012 on the file of I Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada and remanded the same to the trial Court for reconsideration in accordance with law. 4. A perusal of the e-Courts case status in D.V.C. No. 17 of 2012 reveals that the case was dismissed for default on 24.06.2015. It is therefore evident that, following the remand order dated 29.04.2014 passed by the 1st Appellate Court in Crl.A. No. 94 of 2013, the trial Court proceeded to dispose of D.V.C. No. 17 of 2012 on 24.06.2015. In light of the disposal of the main case, this Court is of the view that the cause for the present revision no longer survives for consideration. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive for adjudication. Interim orders granted earlier shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 18.09.2025. MS 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1870 of 2014 Date: 18.09.2025 MS