Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38930 (AP)

M. Ratna Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37795/2018 · 2025-09-14

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010779642018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 37795/2018 Between: 1. M. RATNA KUMAR, S/O M. VERRIYYA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. CORRESPONDENT CBM JR. COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, CBM COMPOUND, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KAKINADA TOWN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAZOLE POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by 2 declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 to accord permission to open suspect sheet against the petitioner vide order No.59/SDPO-A-2018 is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and clear violation of Article 14, 21 of Constitution of India and in violation of A.P. Police Standing orders of 601 and 742 and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to review and close the suspect sheet against the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of suspect sheet against the petitioner vide order No.59/SDPO-A- 2018, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. INAPURAPU SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 37795 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Sri Inapurapu Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as on the date, only two (02) cases are pending against the petitioner and hence, the present Writ Petition may be closed granting liberty to the petitioner to present a representation to the concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police for consideration of his case for closure of Suspect Sheet pending against the Petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned Police Officer to present a representation for consideration of closure of the Rowdy Sheet/Suspect Sheet pending against the Petitioner. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 15.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 37795 of 2018 Date: 15.09.2025 PSA