Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48986 WP No. 26867 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
WRIT PETITION NO.26867 OF 2024 (GM-KEB)
BETWEEN:
SRI D. MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O DODDAIAH, OLD NO.112/A, NEW NO.165, 4TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIVEKANANDA BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE-560003. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI RAVIKUMARA B.R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, BESCOM, K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560009.
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48986 WP No. 26867 of 2024
4.
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM, C2 DIVISION, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003.
5.
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BESCOM C2 SUB DIVISION MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560003.
6.
THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560001.
7.
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BBMP GANDI NAGARA SUB DIVISION GOODS SHED ROAD, BANGALORE-560009. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI B.S. KARTHIKEYAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-6 & R-7)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION LETTER DATED 22.08.2024 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A1 TO A3) AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THEM TO NOT TO INSTALL ANY TRANSFORMER IN THE 4TH CROSS VIVEKANANDA BLOCK, PALACE GUTTAHALLI, BANGALORE- 560003 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48986 WP No. 26867 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 28.10.2025 seeking withdrawal of the petition, which reads as under:
“The petitioner in the above case prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit him to withdraw the above case as not pressed. Since the respondents have already considered the request/representation of the petitioner in the ends of justice.”
2. Memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- ______________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
MBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 74