APHC010798552015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15918 OF Between: Sri Yerri Swamy Harijana Labour Contract Co The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN 2. S D GOWD The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15918 OF 2015 Sri Yerri Swamy Harijana Labour Contract Co-op Society Ltd AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 15918 OF 2015 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…..to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in finalizing the tender in favour of the 3rd respondent for Circle No. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 in pursuant to the e-procurement Tender No.90/AMC/2015-16/General/EEI dated 23.04.2015 for the Non SC, ST Cooperative Societies in violating the . G.O.Ms.No. 581, dt 6.11.1996 and G.O.Ms.No.30 dt 18.06.2000 for supply of manpower on outsourcing basis is illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same consequently direct the 2nd respondent to invite the tenders for supply of manpower on outsourcing basis in Anantapuram Municipal Corporation from the SC and ST Registered Societies and pass such other orders....” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for an adjudication by this Court. 3. While recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 21.03.2025 KK