MADALA VENKATA PRASAD v. MADALA KALYANI @ RAGA KALYANI & 3 OTHERS
CRLRC/281/2013 · 2025-04-07
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38927 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38927 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010798442013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY-FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 281/2013 Between: Madala Venkata Prasad ...PETITIONER AND Madala Kalyani Raga Kalyani 3 others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: T.S.Anirudh Reddy Counsel for the Respondent(S): V.Surendra Reddy Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER:
Heard both sides.
2. Ms. P. Akila Naidu, learned Assistant Public prosecutor submitted that F.C.O.P.No.192 of 2011 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge-Family Court Nellore itself was disposed of ‘allowing in part’ on 05.08.2016.
3. The revision case was filed against an order granting interim maintenance to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 in I.A.No.1705 of 2011 in
2
Dr.YLR, J
Crl.R.C.No.281 of 2013
Dated 07.04.2025
F.C.O.P.No.192 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judge Family Court, SPSR Nellore. In view of the fact that F.C.O.P.No.192 of 2011 it was disposed of by the learned Trial Court, nothing remains in this criminal revision case to adjudicate further. The aggrieved party may take appropriate recourse as per law. Therefore, the criminal revision case is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 07.04.2025 KMS
3
Dr.YLR, J
Crl.R.C.No.281 of 2013
Dated 07.04.2025
116
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 281/2013 07.04.2025
W KMS