HARICHARAN SON OF SHRI SUGAN LLA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/3540/2025 · 2025-07-15
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38923 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:26213] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3540/2025
1. Haricharan Son Of Shri Sugan Lla, Resident Of Bhauaapura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Raj).
2. Smt. Priyanka Wife Of Late Raju Lal, Resident Of Bhauaapura, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Dholpur (Raj).
4. Station House Officer, Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Jain, Adv.with Mr. Dushyant Jain, Adv. For State : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 15/07/2025
1. The present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking directions for fair investigation in the FIR No. 283/2019 dated 04.10.2019 registered at Police Station Sarmathura, District Dholpur for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 365, 302 of the IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that investigation in the FIR(supra) is not conducted in a fair and impartial manner. In this regard, the petitioner has filed a
[2025:RJ-JP:26213] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3540/2025] representation (Annexure-3) before the Inspector General of Police, however, the same is not considered till date.
3. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstance of the case, this Court, in light of the directions encapsulated in Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2008) 2 SCC 409], directs that on 24.07.2025 at 11.00 AM, the petitioner shall mark his presence before concerned Superintendent of Police who shall give audience to the petitioner and take appropriate decision, strictly in accordance with law and as per the facts.
5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /305