Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38923 (PNJ)

RAMESH CHAND v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

LPA/904/2025 · 2025-08-13

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209 LPA-904-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.08.2025 Ramesh Chand ...Appellant Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. P.S. Sekhon, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG, Haryana, for respondent Nos.1 and 2. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though in the present Letters Patent Appeal, the challenge is to the order dated 04.03.2025 passed in CWP-4186-2025 but he will be satisfied in case a direction is given to the Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, to decide the representation dated 31.01.2025 (Annexure P-4) in a time bound manner. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents/State submits that in case, representation dated 31.01.2025 has been received in the office of Deputy Commissioner, Karnal, he will consider the same and pass appropriate order thereon within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, after giving due opportunity to the appellant herein. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present petition may kindly be disposed of as not pressed in the light of the HARISH KUMAR 2025.08.13 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment LPA-904-2025 (O&M) -2- statement made by learned counsel for the respondents/State in Court today. 4. Ordered accordingly. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) August 13, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2025.08.13 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment