IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRt JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 16 OF 2Q2fi RAO Between: Kapavarapu Sai Suneetha, W/o. S. Mahesh Babu, D/o. K.Mohana Rao, aged about 28 Years, Door No.2-59, Pagadalavari Street, Opposite Pagadala ARTAR, Ramavarapadu, Vijayawada. ...PETITIONER AND S. Mahesh Babu, S/o. Late S. Radhakrishna Moorthy aged No. 22-17-58/1 A, Thimminaidupalem, K.R. Nagar, Lepakshi Amigos Apartment, Tirupati, Tirupati District. about 31 Years, Door i Hospital Raod, Near ...RESPONDENT Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the j, the High Court may be on the file of Hon’ble V Additional ' Family Judge Cum IV Additional circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to Transfer the F.C.O.P 198/2024 District Judge Tirupati to the file of Hon’ble District and Sessions Judge at Vijayawada. jA NO: 1 OF 2n9Fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant a stay of all further proceedings in F.C.O.P 198/2024 on the file of V Additional District Judge Tirupati, pending disposal Tr.CMP. of the main Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. KAKUMANU JOJI AMRUTHA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent: SRI CHAMARTHY LEELA SRINNIVASA VARMA Sf The Court made the following ORDER : . / THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION JUDGMENT! RAO No. 16 of 2Q2fi 1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for both sides has represented that the case in F.C.O.P.No.198 of 2024, which is pending before the Family Judge -Cum-V Additional District Judge, Tirupati has been dismissed as not pressed before the Court below and that the present transfer civil miscellaneous petition does cause in the not survive for further adjudication and therefore, the transfer civil miscellaneous petition has become infructuous and requested to close the same. 2. By recording the submission made by the learned appearing for both sides, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions ^tand closed. counsel Petition if any pending, shall SOI- U.SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The V Additional District Judge Tirupati. 2. The Family Judge Vijayawada. cum IV Additional District and Sessions Judge at ■7 // 3. One CC to SRI. KAKUMANU JOJI 4. One CC to SRI. CHAMARTHY LEELA [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies AMRUTHA RAJU Advocate [OPUC] SRINNIVASA VARMA Advocate Chp TAC 1; 5 r HIGH COURT DATED:16/06/2025 ORDER TRCMP.No.16 of 2025 Of 2 2 SEP 2025 X- o ^ Current Section DISMISSING THE TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS