Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38918 (ALL)

MRS. SEEMA ALIAS MANJU LATA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

NA529/808/2025 · 2025-04-10

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:54140 Court No. - 80 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 808 of 2025 Applicant :- Mrs. Seema Alias Manju Lata Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Abhay Pratap Singh,Satya Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to expedite the proceedings of Case No. 3001 of 2022 (State Vs. Vinod Gangwar) arising out of Case Crime No.70 of 2021, under Sections 498-A, 323 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S.- Mahila Thana, District- Bareilly, pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly expeditiously within a stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is the informant in this case. 4. I have considered the submissions and perused the entire record. 5. It reveals from the perusal of the record that the applicant before this Court is the informant. Charges have been framed on 07.10.2024. Since the matter is pending at the stage of evidence and the applicant claims to be the informant of this case, normally, he should be the first witness to be examined before the court instead of appearing before the trial court, the applicant knocked at the door of this Court increasing pendency of cases before this Court, no relief is granted to the applicant rather she is advised to make a request before the trial court for recording of evidence. 6. In the circumstances, the learned trial court is directed to take all possible steps and make all endeavours to dispose of the case preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Shivangi Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad