G.Krishna Reddy, v. The A.P. State Co-operative Rural Irrigation Corporation Ltd
WP/16926/2016 · 2025-06-26
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38914 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38914 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010785262016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 16926/2016 Between:
1. G. KRISHNA REDDY, S/O. PULLA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, ATTENDER (OFFICE SUBORDINATE), 0/O. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (LA), CBR UNIT-II, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE A P STATE COOPERATIVE RURAL IRRIGATION CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, AT 5-10-193, HACA BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, OPP: PUBLIC GARDEN, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD-500004. 2. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT HYDERABAD-500022. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR LA, CBR UNIT-II, PULIVENDULA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT HYDERABAD-500022. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, by declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing proceedings bearing No.E1/RIC/Superannuation/ 2016/566, dt. 19-05-2016, retirement Notice, as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14 & 16 of Constitution of India apart from contrary to the provisions of Act 4 of 2014, dt. 27-6-2014 and Rule 28 (6) of A.P. Co-operative Societies
2
Rules 1964 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner upto 60 years of age and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016 (WPMP 20851 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner in service in accordance with Act 4 of 2014, i.e. till he attains the age of superannuation i.e. 60 years, by suspending the proceedings bearing No.E1/RIC/Superannuation/2016/566, dt. 19-052016, pending final disposal of the main W.P. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S GOPAL RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2.
GP FOR AGRICULTURE (AP) The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in view of the subsequent events, the writ petition renders infructuous. 2. Recording the above said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 27.06.2025 GVK
3
131
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.16926 of 2016
Date: 27.06.2025
GVK