M/s. Majji Gowri Saw Mill and Timber Depot. v. The State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary to
WP/5098/2015 · 2025-07-22
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38913 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010782912015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.5098 of Between: M/s. Majji Gowri Saw Mill and Timber Depot, Ponugotivasala, Santhakaviti Mandal, Srikakulam District. and The State of Telangana represented by Principal Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others. Counsel for the petitioner:
1. P.Sridhar Rao Counsel for the respondents:
1. Government Pleader for Forests (A.P.)
2. Government Pleader for Forests (T.G.) The Court made the following
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed call for the records from the respondents herein and issue direction particularly one in the nature of inaction of the 3rd respondent herein in not forwarding relevant documents vide file no. 40052 of 2013 of petitioner saw mill to the 4 as arbitrary, illegal, contrary to law and also in the Constitution of India, IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Wednesday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms.
Justice B.S Bhanumathi Writ Petition No.5098 of 2015 nd Timber Depot, Ponugotivasala, Santhakaviti Mandal,
…Petitioner represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Forest Department, Secretariat,
… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Counsel for the respondents: Government Pleader for Forests (A.P.) Government Pleader for Forests (T.G.) The Court made the following is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India call for the records from the respondents herein and issue writ direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the respondent herein in not forwarding relevant documents 2013 of petitioner saw mill to the 4th respondent herein ontrary to law and also in violation of Article consequently direct the 3rd respondent herein to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3311] Wednesday, the Twenty Third Day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five
…Petitioner
… Respondents
Constitution of India to writ, order or andamus by declaring the respondent herein in not forwarding relevant documents respondent herein icles 14, 21 of respondent herein to
2
BSB, J
W.P.No.5098 of 2015
forward all the relevant documents vide file no.40052 of 2013 of petitioner saw mill to the 4th respondent herein and on receipt of documents of petitioner saw mill direct the 4th respondent herein to consider for shifting of saw mill from Hyderabad to Srikakulam and pass such other order or orders which the Court deem fit in the interest of justice. 2. No representation for the petitioner inspite of posting the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ as there was no representation on 16.07.2025 as well. 3. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI, J
Date: 23.07.2025 GRL
3
BSB, J
W.P.No.5098 of 2015
238
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
Writ Petition No.5098 of 2015
Date: 23.07.2025 GRL