[2025:RJ-JP:48049] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18240/2025 Priyanka Kumari Sharma D/o Mahesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 34 Years, R/o T.t. West Park, Heera Nagar A, Chitrakoot, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed that the revised/Final answer key along with report of experts of Lecturer (School Education) English for Paper I- General Awareness and General Studies may kindly be uploaded on its official website. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give proper marks to the petitioner for the disputed questions No. 14 and 60 of Paper I of G.K. by considering her evidence in right perspective as well as by deciding the objections submitted by the candidates. iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, impugned result dated 20.08.2025 of Lecturer be declared illegal and same be quashed and set aside as the same has [2025:RJ-JP:48049] (2 of 3) [CW-18240/2025] been declared without issuance of final answer key. (v) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Lecturer English, after correcting the wrong answers in the answer key and award proper marks to the petitioner. V) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner. vi) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order 19.03.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No 14401/2021 (Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board) and other connected maters, submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. M.F. Baig accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board (supra) passed by this Court. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondent within a period of 30 days and the respondent-Authority is directed to consider and decide the representation in light of [2025:RJ-JP:48049] (3 of 3) [CW-18240/2025] ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/49